|
Beginning in the 1800s, it became common practice in
Connecticut to drain, dike, farm, develop, and otherwise alter tidal
wetlands. For the past two decades, coastal resource managers in the
state have aggressively made restoring these defiled estuarine
ecosystems one of their top priorities.
 |
Removing tide gates and replacing undersized culverts are some of the ways
Connecticut has restored more than 60 separate wetlands.
Photo courtesy of Connecticut Office of Long Island Sound Programs
|
In developing our coastal management program in the early 70s,
says Ron Rozsa, coastal ecologist with the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protections (DEP) Office of Long Island Sound Programs,
one of the specific policies that was incorporated encourages restoration
of degraded tidal wetlands. Basically this was the springboard for beginning
our pursuit.
Since then, over 60 separate sites have been restored along
Connecticuts coast, and the first dedicated Wetlands Restoration Unit in
the country was established. Rozsa says the state has been able to make such
progress by teaming with unique partners, developing a streamlined project
review process, assigning a stable funding source, using good science, and
exercising a great deal of patience.
Long Island Sound is a diverse estuary that straddles the border between
coastal Connecticut and coastal New York. The fast pace of shoreline
development in the first half of the 20th century destroyed an estimated 30
percent of Connecticuts 17,500 acres of estuarine ecosystems.
Protection for salt marshes came in 1969 with the passage of the
states Tidal Wetlands Act, which requires that development in the
estuarine environment be consistent with all applicable state rules and
statutes. Since then, wetlands losses in the state have averaged less than a
quarter of an acre a year.
However, Rozsa says, wetlands that had already been degraded were left
unaddressed. The Connecticut Coastal Management Act of 1980 changed that by
establishing a policy to encourage the restoration and rehabilitation of
degraded tidal wetlands. This act became the foundation for the tidal
marsh restoration efforts of DEPs Coastal Area Management Program, now
the Office of Long Island Sound Programs.
The primary approach of DEP has been the restoration of tidal flow through
tide-gate removal and replacement of undersized culverts, and then allowing
Mother Nature to take her course. They have found, Rozsa says, that restoring
tidal action to a salt marsh returns it to a fully functioning estuarine
ecosystem over a period of five to 21 years.
This simple tactic, along with Connecticuts experienced in-house
staff and specialized equipment dedicated to tidal marsh restoration, allows
the state to complete restoration projects at the lowest cost in all of New
England.
Rozsa believes one of the reasons for the programs success is
DEPs partnership with scientists at Connecticut College. This
relationship was forged just prior to the adoption of the Coastal Management
Act when the colleges scientists invited DEP staff to visit their New
London campus to learn about their wetlands research.
This laid the early groundwork for the management/science
partnership, which continues to this day, Rozsa says.
In the early 80s, DEP provided the college with a small grant to
investigate a series of identified wetlands and make recommendations on what
measures were needed to restore them. Since then, the agency has been
systematically restoring the marshes on that list, Rozsa notes.
Connecticut College also has worked with DEP to research a selected series
of sites to assess restoration success, and then design and implement new
projects.
One of the most surprising and successful partnerships, Rozsa says, was
between DEP and the states Mosquito Control Unit.
Beginning after the Civil War, virtually all salt marshes adjacent to the
Sound were altered by a variety of mosquito control activities. Wetlands of all
types were filled, ditched, or drained using tide gates to prevent mosquito
breeding. By the 1940s, nearly all of Connecticuts salt marshes were
ditched.
In 1984, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers took enforcement action against
the mosquito control program, and the agency turned to DEP to get permits to
continue mosquito control using modern techniques such as open marsh water
management and to restore tidal flow to degraded marshes.
It was a revelation to learn that tidal flow restoration to subsided
marsh abated all mosquito breeding and so restoration was embraced by Mosquito
Control as a strategic mosquito control technique, Rozsa says.
Over the next eight years, Mosquito Controls dedicated staff
implemented numerous marsh restoration projects. By 1993, however, the
Department of Health Services could no longer fund the mosquito control
program, so DEP made an agreement to transfer staff and equipment, allowing it
to create a dedicated wetlands restoration program.
Rozsa notes that funding primarily comes from federal grants and support.
This would be more difficult, he says, without a dedicated state wetlands
restoration fund, which is used to match federal monies.
Another key, Rozsa says, has been creating a team to approach each project.
This, along with the success of the restoration efforts, has resulted in state
and federal regulators streamlining the permitting process.
Since the earliest restoration projects in Connecticut, Rozsa
notes, we never tried to make decisions about the final restoration
design independently. We always had a site review committee.
Coastal managers, scientists, nonprofits, and state and federal regulators
are brought into the process early to help design the best restoration
project based on everyones collective input. This review allows
federal and state regulators to simplify the permitting process, which means
more projects get completed.
As a result of DEPs efforts, more than 1,700 acres of
Connecticuts tidal wetlands have been restored.
I want to emphasize what Connecticut has is a wetlands restoration
program, not a plan, Rozsa says. Although it has planning elements,
its a program that consists of dedicated staff, a permitting process
thats been streamlined, and dedicated funding
Plans are nice, but
the day they are printed, they are already out of date.
He adds, The lesson weve learned is to be patient. You can
accomplish the same goals over longer periods of time at a lower cost, if
youre patient
One needs to think on geologic terms, not on human
time frames.
For more information on Connecticuts tidal marsh restoration
program, contact Ron Rozsa at (860) 424-3616, or ron.rozsa@po.state.ct.us. or visit http://camel2.conncoll.edu/ccrec/greennet/arbo/ublications/34/MAIN.HTM.
Source: Coastal Services, March/April 2003
|